Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-07 | -- |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a 90.7 score against 71.7. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is notably thinner and way lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a much larger display, a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a just a bit higher amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a much more megapixels back camera. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features improved battery life than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.