Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, having a 75.8 score against 71.7. Galaxy S7 Active is a heavier and thicker phone than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a little bit larger screen, more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Galaxy S7 Active takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 200 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4100mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S7 Active is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S7 Active, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.