Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's 71.7 score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy Z Flip body is noticeably newer and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, although it's also somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a way bigger display.
Galaxy Z Flip shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.