Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.1 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.0 |
| 2016-11-07 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 104.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 8937 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 4, with a general score of 71.5 against 67.1. Galaxy S III Cricket is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 4. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a little higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 16 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi 4 also counts with more cores. Xiaomi Redmi 4 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 4 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a way more megapixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.