Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.8 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.0 |
| 2016-11-11 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.51 x 2.77 x 0.33 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.64 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 104.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3120mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, having a 71.5 score against 65.8. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4a has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy S III Cricket construction is just a little heavier and a little thicker than Xiaomi Redmi 4a.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy S III Cricket has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1280 x 720 resolution, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a little greater screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 4a also has a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 64 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 3120mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S III Cricket is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.