Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.0 |
| 2017-12-12 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.98 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has an overall score of 71.5, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi 5's 67.2 score. Galaxy S III Cricket's construction is somewhat lighter but thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi 5. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version while Xiaomi Redmi 5 has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
Galaxy S III Cricket features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 5, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1280 x 720 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi 5 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and more cores.
Xiaomi Redmi 5 features a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi 5 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 5 counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi 5 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi 5 also has a larger aperture and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S III Cricket is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.