Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
16 GB U.S. CellularSCH-I535
| Global Score | |
| 68.2 | 70.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2020-07-15 | 2012-06-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 4.70 ounces |
| Carbon grey, Ocean green and Sky blue | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 126.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G25 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III has a score of 70.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9A's 68.2 general score. Galaxy S III is an incredibly older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9A, but it's a bit thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Galaxy S III has the newer 4.1.2 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9A has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S III counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, because although it has a quite lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S III has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9A features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi 9A also counts with a higher number of faster cores. The Xiaomi Redmi 9A features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III takes clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, although it has a lower 1920x1080 video definition and a camera with way less megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S III not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.