Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-15 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Carbon grey, Ocean green and Sky blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 126.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G25 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, having a general score of 79.5 against 68.2. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is an a lot older device than the Xiaomi Redmi 9A, but it's somewhat thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a way better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 and Xiaomi Redmi 9A have similar processors, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 has less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S7 counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, because although it has a less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.