Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a score of 80.2 against 78.2. The Google Pixel body is notably lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although it was released 4 years before. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has more cpu cores (although slower).
The Google Pixel has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a lot better resolution back camera, a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 117 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.