Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a overall score of 78.8 against 78.2. The Google Pixel 3a construction is thinner and much lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although it was released just a little more than a year before. These devices work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features.
Google Pixel 3a's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Redmi 9T, they have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM. The Google Pixel 3a features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 100% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.