Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's general score of 78.2. The Google Pixel 4 body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even though it was released around 15 months before. Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.