Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having an 82.9 score against 78.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10. The Google Pixel 4a design is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even when both were only released 5 months apart.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a little greater display density. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 48 MP resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.