Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. The Google Pixel 5 construction is thinner and much lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Google Pixel 5 features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.