Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with a general score of 87.1 against 78.2. LG Velvet is a a bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart. LG Velvet has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bigger screen.
LG Velvet has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Velvet takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, a same size camera aperture and the same camera sensor size, the LG Velvet also has a lot better (4K) video definition.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.