Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a global score of 83.4 against 78.2. Even though Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's thinner and incredibly newer. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite lower pixels count per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a camera in the back with a higher resolution, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.