Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a general score of 87.1 against 78.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite worse pixel quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.