Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a 79.2 score against 78.2. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is a lot newer and much thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and a much higher video definition.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with greater battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.