Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has an overall score of 78.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi 9T's design is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has 1 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a larger aperture and a much better resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.