Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having an 83.8 score against 78.2. The Galaxy A50 body is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even though it was released around 23 months before. Galaxy A50 features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.