Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having an 86.6 score against 78.2. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should count with all the same operating system features. The Galaxy A50s is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but it is way thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. The Galaxy A50s features much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A50s has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A50s has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way better (4K) video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.