Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's global score of 78.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, providing some extra features and performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
Galaxy A52 5G has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit higher pixel number per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures, a back camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.