Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's general score of 78.2. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the user all the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although both were released only 6 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit worse pixel quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality, a camera with a much better resolution and a way better video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.