Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting an 88.1 score against 78.2. The Galaxy F62 design is a little thinner but just a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and both were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger display. Galaxy F62 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 has superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.