Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is a lot thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but it is a lot heavier and was released just 16 months before. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Fold features a display that is very similar to the screen in Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.