Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a general score of 98.9 against 78.2. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is somewhat thinner but a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and both of them were released with only 5 months difference.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little larger screen and a little higher screen density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.