Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting an 89 score against 78.2. Even though Galaxy Note10 is older than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.