Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a general score of 79.5 against 78.2. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note7 is incredibly older than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a slightly better storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a much more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.