Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with a score of 95.4 against 78.2. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer and a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit larger display and a greater count of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much larger sensor, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.