Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | -- |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a 90.7 score against 78.2. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much thinner and much lighter device than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a little larger display, more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a lot better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a larger camera aperture, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.