Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-18 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | -- |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's design is just a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. These devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processor. The Galaxy S6 Active has a way better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixels number in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back, a much bigger sensor and a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.