Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's overall score of 78.2. The Galaxy S7 is an incredibly older phone than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but Samsung was able to make it noticeably lighter and thinner. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a little faster CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has 4 more cores.
The Galaxy S7 has an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 100 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.