Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a general score of 78.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Even though Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's a bit thinner and noticeably newer. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a higher number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.