Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a score of 80.1 against 78.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, counting with a couple nice extra features. Even being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it's also older, a lot heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Xiaomi Redmi 9T and Galaxy XCover FieldPro both count with really similar storage capacity for apps and games, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.