Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a overall score of 81 against 78.2. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, so it provides you some extra features and performance tweaks. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better phone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, we must highlight that it's also older, heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, they have exactly the same internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more MP camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.