Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with a 92.3 score against 78.2. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features and optimized performance. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi 9T were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit lighter and notably thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a little greater pixels density, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little bit bigger display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has an 82% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.