Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with a overall score of 90.6 against 78.2. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Xiaomi Redmi 9T were released with only 7 months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is notably thinner but also noticeably heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and better performance.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a display that is just as good as the display in Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture and a camera with way more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.