Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's 79.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 construction is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 3 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density. Google Pixel 3's camera is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G one, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a way lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way tinier camera sensor, they both have the same camera aperture.
Google Pixel 3's storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.