Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-05-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G construction is incredibly newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it is a little bit thicker and a lot heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Google Pixel 3a features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, they have the same internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity. Google Pixel 3a counts with a camera that is just as good as the camera in Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a way worse 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor, they both have a same size aperture.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is a better device, it costs a little more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.