Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-05-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a global score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's design is extremely newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Google Pixel 3a XL's memory for applications and games is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's one, they have equal 64 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G and the Google Pixel 3a XL both have quite similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a lot smaller sensor which offers a lot lower photo and video quality and a way worse resolution back camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is a better device, it is more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.