Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, with a global score of 81.9 against 79.5. Google Pixel 4's design is just a little thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it was released about a year before. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G one, they have the same internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. Google Pixel 4 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a way tinier back camera sensor which gives a lot worse photo and video quality and a much worse 12.2 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.