Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-05-26 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's global score of 79.5. Even when the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G were only released 6 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a little bit thinner and lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a way tinier sensor offering a way worse image quality and a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.