Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-26 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G body is newer than the HTC U Ultra's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a smaller camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.