Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-05-26 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's body is newer, just a little bit thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G and the nubia Red Magic 3S count with quite similar screens, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a little inferior pixel quantity per screen inch and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a same resolution back camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger aperture for better photos in low light situations. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with much more storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S's battery performance is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G one.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.