Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-26 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's 79.5 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is incredibly older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, it's body is lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. They have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 has a display that's very similar to the display in Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although the Galaxy A50 has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a much worse resolution camera and a way tinier sensor taking much worse quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.