Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-26 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, having a overall score of 80.4 against 79.5. Even though the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is noticeably older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger sensor taking better quality photos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.