Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-05-26 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Blue and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a global score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G body has the same thickness than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's camera is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's camera, although the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much smaller camera sensor shooting lot lower quality videos and pictures, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images or video in low light situations and a way less megapixels resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.