Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-26 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 79.5 against 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it is also a little bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G also has a larger number of cores (and faster). The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features improved battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.