Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-26 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 79.5. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must note that it is also a much older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier cellphone. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S8 Active has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. Galaxy S8 Active features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S8 Active also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's camera is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a way tinier sensor which offers a way lower photo and video quality and a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S8 Active is a better device, it is more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S8 Active, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.