Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-05-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, with an 81 score against 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide all the same operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G feature similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro's camera is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a way lower 25 mega pixels resolution camera and a much tinier back camera sensor shooting lot lower quality videos and images, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.