Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-05-26 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's 79.5 global score. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, it's construction is thinner and a little bit lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has Android 11, giving you some extra features.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has a bit better pixel density, a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit larger display. The Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels and a lot smaller back camera sensor, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.